<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Download Microsoft Security Essentials Beta</title> <atom:link href="http://tech-buzz.net/2009/06/29/download-microsoft-security-essentials-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2009/06/29/download-microsoft-security-essentials-beta/</link> <description>Tech Tips, Mobiles, Web and Computer How-Tos</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 10:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Prostate Problems</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2009/06/29/download-microsoft-security-essentials-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-143846</link> <dc:creator>Prostate Problems</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 11:36:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/?p=2709#comment-143846</guid> <description>It works for me. I have never fallen for spin-doctor scaring tactics to get people to invest in paid-for anti-malware products. MSE has been the missing piece of the puzzle â€“ I am only surprised it took this long â€“ and it is here at last. All I want is something simple (no nags) and something I can trust. Hate MS all you like but they had massive resources to fall back on when creating MSE, and I subsequently trust them to do a good job. All those years of sucking in data and examining it has, I believe, produced a product that will suit the masses perfectly and do an outstanding job. Why would you spend good money when this is free, very good, and trustworthy. Bash it for technical reasons, but donâ€™t knock it just because it is MS. If I had share in Symantec or Nod32 I would be worried. I have always run XP with Windows firewall and Avast, but now with MSE on the scene I am all Microsoft. Incidentally I have never been infected. Use it and enjoy the freedom from subscriptions.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It works for me. I have never fallen for spin-doctor scaring tactics to get people to invest in paid-for anti-malware products. MSE has been the missing piece of the puzzle â€“ I am only surprised it took this long â€“ and it is here at last.<br /> All I want is something simple (no nags) and something I can trust. Hate MS all you like but they had massive resources to fall back on when creating MSE, and I subsequently trust them to do a good job. All those years of sucking in data and examining it has, I believe, produced a product that will suit the masses perfectly and do an outstanding job. Why would you spend good money when this is free, very good, and trustworthy.<br /> Bash it for technical reasons, but donâ€™t knock it just because it is MS. If I had share in Symantec or Nod32 I would be worried.<br /> I have always run XP with Windows firewall and Avast, but now with MSE on the scene I am all Microsoft. Incidentally I have never been infected.<br /> Use it and enjoy the freedom from subscriptions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 237/278 objects using apc

Served from: tech-buzz.net @ 2012-05-25 13:46:54 -->
