<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Apple Rejects iPhone App Developers</title> <atom:link href="http://tech-buzz.net/2008/03/15/apple-rejects-iphone-app-developers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2008/03/15/apple-rejects-iphone-app-developers/</link> <description>Tech Tips, Mobiles, Web and Computer How-Tos</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Dr SEO</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2008/03/15/apple-rejects-iphone-app-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-144296</link> <dc:creator>Dr SEO</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:14:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2008/03/15/apple-rejects-iphone-app-developers/#comment-144296</guid> <description>A friend of mine has been accepted and then rejected the same day. Apparently it was a computer error.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine has been accepted and then rejected the same day. Apparently it was a computer error.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steve Elliott</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2008/03/15/apple-rejects-iphone-app-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-139087</link> <dc:creator>Steve Elliott</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:35:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2008/03/15/apple-rejects-iphone-app-developers/#comment-139087</guid> <description>Why limit development.  Fair enough that they want to ensure quality control but surely the more apps that are available, the more saleable the phone is.Sometimes firms just get too big for their boots.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why limit development.  Fair enough that they want to ensure quality control but surely the more apps that are available, the more saleable the phone is.</p><p>Sometimes firms just get too big for their boots.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dr SEO</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2008/03/15/apple-rejects-iphone-app-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-139068</link> <dc:creator>Dr SEO</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:56:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2008/03/15/apple-rejects-iphone-app-developers/#comment-139068</guid> <description>A friend of mine has been accepted and then rejected the same day. Apparently it was a computer error.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine has been accepted and then rejected the same day. Apparently it was a computer error.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kmofo</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2008/03/15/apple-rejects-iphone-app-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-139061</link> <dc:creator>Kmofo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:02:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2008/03/15/apple-rejects-iphone-app-developers/#comment-139061</guid> <description>I&#039;m sure quality was the issue. Maybe they did some checks before sending out rejection letters.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure quality was the issue. Maybe they did some checks before sending out rejection letters.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Retodon8</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2008/03/15/apple-rejects-iphone-app-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-139060</link> <dc:creator>Retodon8</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:47:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2008/03/15/apple-rejects-iphone-app-developers/#comment-139060</guid> <description>They never actually reject or accept the request in that letter; it just asks to wait, reiterating old stuff. It&#039;s impossible to say if others maybe did get accepted. If you send them a letter, you basically ask them a simple yes or no question. I would&#039;ve written them again asking for an actual answer.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They never actually reject or accept the request in that letter; it just asks to wait, reiterating old stuff. It&#8217;s impossible to say if others maybe did get accepted. If you send them a letter, you basically ask them a simple yes or no question. I would&#8217;ve written them again asking for an actual answer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nathaniel</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2008/03/15/apple-rejects-iphone-app-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-139039</link> <dc:creator>Nathaniel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 03:03:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2008/03/15/apple-rejects-iphone-app-developers/#comment-139039</guid> <description>This does sound strange for a company like Apple. I hope to hear what happens next.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This does sound strange for a company like Apple. I hope to hear what happens next.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ashish Mohta</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2008/03/15/apple-rejects-iphone-app-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-139035</link> <dc:creator>Ashish Mohta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:16:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2008/03/15/apple-rejects-iphone-app-developers/#comment-139035</guid> <description>If its in beta closed public thats going to happen. People might need to wait for sometime more</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If its in beta closed public thats going to happen. People might need to wait for sometime more</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 1/11 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 361/365 objects using apc

Served from: tech-buzz.net @ 2012-02-09 19:37:49 -->
