Comments on: No More WGA Validation Required for Internet Explorer 7 http://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/ Tech Tips, Mobiles, Web and Computer How-Tos Tue, 22 May 2012 10:58:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Rajanhttp://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/comment-page-1/#comment-144259 Rajan Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:10:02 +0000 http://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/#comment-144259 @faqfc and @shashank<br>Well i would suggest of not using IE7 unless it is on Vista(preloaded).<br>I use WinXp(genuine :) ) and i have used IE7, and to be frank, i had the max trouble dealing with IE7.<br><br>Moreover, your system will be leaft with extraordinary security settings once you uninstall and rollback to IE6 @faqfc and @shashank
Well i would suggest of not using IE7 unless it is on Vista(preloaded).
I use WinXp(genuine :) ) and i have used IE7, and to be frank, i had the max trouble dealing with IE7.

Moreover, your system will be leaft with extraordinary security settings once you uninstall and rollback to IE6

]]> By: Sreejithhttp://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/comment-page-1/#comment-135889 Sreejith Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:54:36 +0000 http://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/#comment-135889 They probably know that there are less Genuine users than dodos in this world. lol They probably know that there are less Genuine users than dodos in this world. lol

]]> By: The Real Proxyhttp://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/comment-page-1/#comment-135863 The Real Proxy Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:50:11 +0000 http://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/#comment-135863 yes i agreed with this... i dont barely use IE cause its SUCKS yes i agreed with this… i dont barely use IE cause its SUCKS

]]> By: fasanghttp://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/comment-page-1/#comment-135763 fasang Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:21:45 +0000 http://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/#comment-135763 As webdesigner ie7 is a disaster, event more then ie6...I wonder why anyone wants to stick with that... ok there are enough css hacks arround right now for designing 'well' in ie6 and i bet in a year or so that will be the case to for ie7... but in the mean time, webpages design for firefox, safari and ie6 that are as STANDARD as possible will just look awfull in ie7... 2 steps forward 1 back... seems to be the case here..To make it free for pireted versions? People should buy or go to free resources, don't try to get a bite out of 2!Gl, Fasang As webdesigner ie7 is a disaster, event more then ie6…

I wonder why anyone wants to stick with that… ok there are enough css hacks arround right now for designing ‘well’ in ie6 and i bet in a year or so that will be the case to for ie7… but in the mean time, webpages design for firefox, safari and ie6 that are as STANDARD as possible will just look awfull in ie7… 2 steps forward 1 back… seems to be the case here..

To make it free for pireted versions? People should buy or go to free resources, don’t try to get a bite out of 2!

Gl,
Fasang

]]> By: Shashankhttp://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/comment-page-1/#comment-135746 Shashank Sat, 06 Oct 2007 16:55:01 +0000 http://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/#comment-135746 @Rajan I think you are talking about the IE7 beta ..IE7 should be ok. @Rajan
I think you are talking about the IE7 beta ..IE7 should be ok.

]]> By: Nirmalhttp://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/comment-page-1/#comment-135745 Nirmal Sat, 06 Oct 2007 15:32:27 +0000 http://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/#comment-135745 I think this is a good move to increase the usage of IE, firefox seems to be increasing its share. I think this is a good move to increase the usage of IE, firefox seems to be increasing its share.

]]> By: indyankhttp://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/comment-page-1/#comment-135741 indyank Sat, 06 Oct 2007 13:54:41 +0000 http://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/#comment-135741 Don't get awed by this microsoft gimmick...you would never know what micrsoft is upto... Don’t get awed by this microsoft gimmick…you would never know what micrsoft is upto…

]]> By: Shankar Ganeshhttp://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/comment-page-1/#comment-135737 Shankar Ganesh Sat, 06 Oct 2007 12:05:02 +0000 http://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/#comment-135737 Just installed IE 7. It's slick. It's just slow in rendering pages. Just installed IE 7. It’s slick. It’s just slow in rendering pages.

]]> By: Rajanhttp://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/comment-page-1/#comment-135729 Rajan Sat, 06 Oct 2007 10:48:08 +0000 http://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/#comment-135729 @faqfc and @shashank Well i would suggest of not using IE7 unless it is on Vista(preloaded). I use WinXp(genuine :) ) and i have used IE7, and to be frank, i had the max trouble dealing with IE7.Moreover, your system will be leaft with extraordinary security settings once you uninstall and rollback to IE6 @faqfc and @shashank
Well i would suggest of not using IE7 unless it is on Vista(preloaded).
I use WinXp(genuine :) ) and i have used IE7, and to be frank, i had the max trouble dealing with IE7.

Moreover, your system will be leaft with extraordinary security settings once you uninstall and rollback to IE6

]]> By: Marchttp://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/comment-page-1/#comment-135727 Marc Sat, 06 Oct 2007 08:42:39 +0000 http://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/#comment-135727 Many people wanted to try IE7 when it was released but were unable to do so because of WGA. This measure is rather late because people have already forgotten IE7. Many people wanted to try IE7 when it was released but were unable to do so because of WGA. This measure is rather late because people have already forgotten IE7.

]]> By: Shashankhttp://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/comment-page-1/#comment-135726 Shashank Sat, 06 Oct 2007 08:27:10 +0000 http://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/#comment-135726 even my original XP is still using version IE 6 because i use firefox mainly..now i will think about upgrading :) even my original XP is still using version IE 6 because i use firefox mainly..now i will think about upgrading :)

]]> By: faqfchttp://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/comment-page-1/#comment-135723 faqfc Sat, 06 Oct 2007 05:12:53 +0000 http://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/#comment-135723 this is indeed great news. yeah i'm stuck with IE6, gonna try update to v7 soonthanks for the tip this is indeed great news. yeah i’m stuck with IE6, gonna try update to v7 soon

thanks for the tip

]]> By: No More WGA Validation Required for Internet Explorer 7http://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/comment-page-1/#comment-135712 No More WGA Validation Required for Internet Explorer 7 Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:43:53 +0000 http://tech-buzz.net/2007/10/05/no-more-wga-validation-required-for-internet-explorer-7/#comment-135712 [...] You can read the rest of this blog post by going to the original source, here [...] [...] You can read the rest of this blog post by going to the original source, here [...]

]]>