Comments on: Microsoft SharedView Beta (formerly Codenamed Tahiti) http://tech-buzz.net/2007/05/14/microsoft-sharedview-beta-formerly-codenamed-tahiti/ Tech News, Web and Geeky Stuff! Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:35:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Microsoft SharedView : Online Screen Sharing http://tech-buzz.net/2007/05/14/microsoft-sharedview-beta-formerly-codenamed-tahiti/comment-page-1/#comment-80785 Microsoft SharedView : Online Screen Sharing Tue, 15 May 2007 18:39:30 +0000 http://tech-buzz.net/2007/05/14/microsoft-sharedview-beta-formerly-codenamed-tahiti/#comment-80785 [...] to Tech Buzz for the release [...] [...] to Tech Buzz for the release [...]

]]> By: SAP BW http://tech-buzz.net/2007/05/14/microsoft-sharedview-beta-formerly-codenamed-tahiti/comment-page-1/#comment-80596 SAP BW Tue, 15 May 2007 06:38:18 +0000 http://tech-buzz.net/2007/05/14/microsoft-sharedview-beta-formerly-codenamed-tahiti/#comment-80596 No doubt, it should be an excellent tool. I will looking forward to try it asap. Gili No doubt, it should be an excellent tool. I will looking forward to try it asap.

Gili

]]> By: fo.unta.in http://tech-buzz.net/2007/05/14/microsoft-sharedview-beta-formerly-codenamed-tahiti/comment-page-1/#comment-80569 fo.unta.in Tue, 15 May 2007 04:09:32 +0000 http://tech-buzz.net/2007/05/14/microsoft-sharedview-beta-formerly-codenamed-tahiti/#comment-80569 Unless Silverlight clicks, Microsoft is in deep trouble. Slowly but steadily they are becoming irrelevant. Unless Silverlight clicks, Microsoft is in deep trouble. Slowly but steadily they are becoming irrelevant.

]]> By: Samir http://tech-buzz.net/2007/05/14/microsoft-sharedview-beta-formerly-codenamed-tahiti/comment-page-1/#comment-80504 Samir Mon, 14 May 2007 22:16:38 +0000 http://tech-buzz.net/2007/05/14/microsoft-sharedview-beta-formerly-codenamed-tahiti/#comment-80504 An interesting and useful idea that is bound to capture a strong following in time. As far as the "only in the USA" clause, I am guessing that's more of the USA's archaic cryptography laws at work. For a live network collaborative tool such as this to be feasible, I am quite sure all data transmission needs to be heavily encrypted to protect the privacy of these exchanges. That would mean that the software includes encryption and decryption technology, possibly of a high order of complexity ("bits"). That would mean it would be classified, along with all other complex encryption software, under the same category as weapons and other threats to "national defense". So the American company (Microsoft) might not be allowed to "export" such technologies outside the country. Anyone remember the mess with PGP encrytion technology in the 90s? An interesting and useful idea that is bound to capture a strong following in time.

As far as the “only in the USA” clause, I am guessing that’s more of the USA’s archaic cryptography laws at work. For a live network collaborative tool such as this to be feasible, I am quite sure all data transmission needs to be heavily encrypted to protect the privacy of these exchanges. That would mean that the software includes encryption and decryption technology, possibly of a high order of complexity (“bits”). That would mean it would be classified, along with all other complex encryption software, under the same category as weapons and other threats to “national defense”. So the American company (Microsoft) might not be allowed to “export” such technologies outside the country.

Anyone remember the mess with PGP encrytion technology in the 90s?

]]>