Comments on: Wikipedia Goes Nofollow

By: Katya

Katya — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:46:14 +0000

I am not surprised either. He he. Who love spammers?
William, nothing is free in this world, leave wiki alone, otherwise it becomes to a rubish bin!

By: Marketing

Marketing — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:17:55 +0000

Well I don’t blame them. I’d do the same.

By: Ps3 Gamer

Ps3 Gamer — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:37:53 +0000

Im not sure why they are doing this. If you try and post a link to your website they delete it. So it does’nt make a difference.

By: Dr SEO

Dr SEO — Mon, 05 May 2008 11:52:21 +0000

Did not they have nofollow for ages now? Anyways, I have solid proof that nofollow will still count. It’s just it wont parse PR and no one cares about PR anyway. I would post a link to my article on nofollow but then I will probably sound like a spammer.

By: Flash Gamer

Flash Gamer — Tue, 12 Feb 2008 05:36:21 +0000

This is unfortunate, but the amount of man power it would take to combat this type of spam is too much. It’s becoming more common on the net.

By: Seomotion

Seomotion — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:53:40 +0000

It’s right decision – to protect Wiki of spammer, but it is bad for content publishers too

By: Selbourne Designing

Selbourne Designing — Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:36:17 +0000

It seems to have come very late in the day. I was about time. Those genuinely interested in contributing towards wiki will always be there and since its become a huge resource. Sites will keep linking back and talking about the same.

By: ScottUA

ScottUA — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:25:36 +0000

Seems to be the way of the world. You have a great resource which people use for legit sites. Then a blackhater will come in and ruin it for the rest of us.

By: asso

asso — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:23:38 +0000

I think they must find a better way to prevent spam .
Making nofollow links will hurt publishers.

By: Yuriy

Yuriy — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:44:45 +0000

Yeahh. William – it was not your day. Wiki with it’s resources can filter “black” links with no problems. Maybe it is temporary solution?

By: Bidding Directory

Bidding Directory — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:08:25 +0000

I do not agree with this to. That’s very unfair, wikipedia editors delete all link withc aren’t related with article. However this is very unfair for publishers. What on earth will motivate them?

By: Marc

Marc — Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:27:15 +0000

It’s very sad that some bunch of people using black hat technique do such spamming activities. There should be a method devised so as to ban only the spammers and innocent and modest posters like us should be saved from the ill efforts taken by others. But I guess it is a very difficult task to differentiate between the black hat and the white hat guys….

By: William

William — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:48:28 +0000

I cant believe it. Yesterday i worked 3 hours to get a link to my blog ( http://www.seo.webarticles.dk ) on Wikipedia! That is so unfair! But now people got no reason to post on that site…? Is that a good thing for Wikipedia?

By: Payback on Wikipedia » Tecnocracia : Estado TecnolÃƒÂ³gico

Payback on Wikipedia » Tecnocracia : Estado TecnolÃƒÂ³gico — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 02:05:43 +0000

[...] to add rel=”nofollow” attribute on all external links of their articles, many blogs and sites had pronounced in support or protest. The attribute in question makes the presented links to be [...]

By: zoid

zoid — Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:48:52 +0000

This is good for prevent spamming, however i have very great articles for Turkish people and i would like to have some quality from wiki, but nofollow tag is not good for original content publishers like me. My website is small, but i only publish articles written by me.

By: knight17

knight17 — Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:45:26 +0000

This is a good move to avoid spammers targetting vista.But very bad for content publishers