By Thilak January 22, 2007

Wikipedia Goes Nofollow

In an effort to fight spam, Wikipedia now puts the “nofollow” to all external links on all its pages. Wikipedia’s articles rank well among search engines; they also have high Pagerank and some blackhat spammers participating in the “World Search Engine Optimization Championship” tried to exploit this by placing a bogus link which has no reference to the article at all.

I’m not surprised by this move, but it has its own pros as well as cons. Adding “nofollow” attribute to all external links would probable hurt the sentiments of those who regularly contribute to Wikipedia. Philipp Lenssen on Google Blogoscoped writes:

What happens as a consequence, in my opinion, is that Wikipedia gets valuable backlinks from all over the web, in huge quantity, and of huge importance – normal links, not “nofollow” links; this is what makes Wikipedia rank so well – but as of now, they’re not giving any of this back

I would certainly agree with Philipp in this regard. Folks at WikiMedia should work on a better spam prevention technique, like adding “nofollow” attribute to links from a particular domain (not all external links).

Some search engines like WikiSeek depend upon Wikipedia’s external links for the sake for relevancy, now that they have put nofollow attribute to all external links. Will it affect those search engines?

News Source: Search Engine Journal

Related Posts that you may like:

Discussion

Comments for “Wikipedia Goes Nofollow”

  • This is a good move to avoid spammers targetting vista.But very bad for content publishers
  • This is good for prevent spamming, however i have very great articles for Turkish people and i would like to have some quality from wiki, but nofollow tag is not good for original content publishers like me. My website is small, but i only publish articles written by me.
  • I cant believe it. Yesterday i worked 3 hours to get a link to my blog ( http://www.seo.webarticles.dk ) on Wikipedia! That is so unfair! But now people got no reason to post on that site...? Is that a good thing for Wikipedia?
  • It's very sad that some bunch of people using black hat technique do such spamming activities. There should be a method devised so as to ban only the spammers and innocent and modest posters like us should be saved from the ill efforts taken by others. But I guess it is a very difficult task to differentiate between the black hat and the white hat guys....
  • I do not agree with this to. That's very unfair, wikipedia editors delete all link withc aren't related with article. However this is very unfair for publishers. What on earth will motivate them?
blog comments powered by Disqus

Welcome to TechBuzz

TechBuzz is a technology blog read by 3000+ readers every day. We regularly write about new trends in technology, useful computer application and new web services. If you are new here, please subscribe our feed or opt for email updates to get new articles to your inbox.

Free Daily Updates

You can get fresh daily articles delivered straight to your feed reader or email inbox. Please subscribe to our RSS feed or opt for our free newsletter

Recent Posts

Ixquick. Ixquick allows users to surf the web with complete privacy. It let’s users surf the world wide web safely without revealing any personally identifiable or private information to the websites being viewed.

Ixquick is a free service which provides complete anonymity to the user enabling the user to surf the internet anonymously and safely. They claim it to be world’s most private search engine.

Surf The Internet Anonymously With Ixquick!

Surf The Internet Anonymously With Ixquick!
January 28, 2010
By Meghan
Apple iPad Unveiled
January 28, 2010
By Meghan
Happy New Year!
January 1, 2010
By Meghan
WordPress Version 2.9 Is Out!
December 19, 2009
By Meghan
Lunascape 6 Orion: World’s Only Triple Engine Browser
December 13, 2009
By Meghan