<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Jimmy Wales To Compete With Google</title> <atom:link href="http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/</link> <description>Tech Tips, Mobiles, Web and Computer How-Tos</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Thilak</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-23460</link> <dc:creator>Thilak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 17:49:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-23460</guid> <description>Anirudh: Yeah, that&#039;s what I meant to say</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anirudh: Yeah, that&#8217;s what I meant to say</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anirudh</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-23295</link> <dc:creator>Anirudh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 14:52:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-23295</guid> <description>I was talking about this: &lt;blockquote&gt;The first three results will be Wikipedia content and remain results will be determined by WikipediaÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s outbound links. So if a site has more links from Wikipedia then the site will climb up in the SERP page.&lt;/blockquote&gt; and you mean &quot;remaining links&quot; which mean the other search results. This block of text is rather unclear.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was talking about this:</p><blockquote><p>The first three results will be Wikipedia content and remain results will be determined by WikipediaÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s outbound links. So if a site has more links from Wikipedia then the site will climb up in the SERP page.</p></blockquote><p>and you mean &#8220;remaining links&#8221; which mean the other search results. This block of text is rather unclear.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thilak</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-22798</link> <dc:creator>Thilak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 07:50:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-22798</guid> <description>Anirudh: I disagree with you on this regard. The new Search Engine will comeout of Wikia Labs, it has nothing to do with Wikipedia. Its a standalone Search Engine.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anirudh: I disagree with you on this regard. The new Search Engine will comeout of Wikia Labs, it has nothing to do with Wikipedia. Its a standalone Search Engine.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anirudh</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-22612</link> <dc:creator>Anirudh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 05:21:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-22612</guid> <description>ps. tech crunch watermark on image</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps. tech crunch watermark on image</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anirudh</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-22610</link> <dc:creator>Anirudh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 05:20:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-22610</guid> <description>Well, this will be okay to replace wikipedia&#039;s current search, but it won&#039;t affect google. Say I&#039;m searching for information on the grand canyon, I&#039;ll get relevant details, but If I&#039;m looking for a technical question on linux, this will not yield the proper results. Google must partner with wikipedia and offer one result at the top if a corresponding wikipedia article is available.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this will be okay to replace wikipedia&#8217;s current search, but it won&#8217;t affect google. Say I&#8217;m searching for information on the grand canyon, I&#8217;ll get relevant details, but If I&#8217;m looking for a technical question on linux, this will not yield the proper results. Google must partner with wikipedia and offer one result at the top if a corresponding wikipedia article is available.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ashish Mohta</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-21933</link> <dc:creator>Ashish Mohta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 19:25:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-21933</guid> <description>I didnt get it, why not a common indexing.I mean googles indexing and now wikpedia .....dont we need some standard? At the end it iwll be like 3 search engine providing ranks to each site whom would u go for.Obviously which dominates but that isnt right.Like they all agreed on the common sitemap I am thinking if they can have a common thing for page ranking and indexing.Difficult though but an idea for sure..And wikpedia results 3 top....i dont like that</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didnt get it, why not a common indexing.I mean googles indexing and now wikpedia &#8230;..dont we need some standard? At the end it iwll be like 3 search engine providing ranks to each site whom would u go for.Obviously which dominates but that isnt right.</p><p>Like they all agreed on the common sitemap I am thinking if they can have a common thing for page ranking and indexing.Difficult though but an idea for sure..</p><p>And wikpedia results 3 top&#8230;.i dont like that</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mr.Cool</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-21803</link> <dc:creator>Mr.Cool</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 18:03:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-21803</guid> <description>Question would be - What made Techcrunch to take such a big risk ?I have to say that that was daring ! It could have killed any small blog !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question would be &#8211; What made Techcrunch to take such a big risk ?</p><p>I have to say that that was daring ! It could have killed any small blog !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thilak</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-21768</link> <dc:creator>Thilak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 17:36:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-21768</guid> <description>Good to see lots of interaction going on at this post, but I wonder why TechCrunch posted a fake screenshot ?Doesn&#039;t it hurt their ethics ?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see lots of interaction going on at this post, but I wonder why TechCrunch posted a fake screenshot ?</p><p>Doesn&#8217;t it hurt their ethics ?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mr.Cool</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-21718</link> <dc:creator>Mr.Cool</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 16:52:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-21718</guid> <description>Story needs to be updated...Jimbo commented on my blog and he says Techcrunch&#039;s story is wrong ! http://www.technobeta.com/posts/wikiasari-the-search-engine-from-wikipedia/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Story needs to be updated&#8230;</p><p>Jimbo commented on my blog and he says Techcrunch&#8217;s story is wrong !<br /> <a href="http://www.technobeta.com/posts/wikiasari-the-search-engine-from-wikipedia/" rel="nofollow">http://www.technobeta.com/posts/wikiasari-the-search-engine-from-wikipedia/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sankar Anand</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-21443</link> <dc:creator>Sankar Anand</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:17:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-21443</guid> <description>the screen shot looks pretty good but the ads in the page looks ugly.. bloated.....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the screen shot looks pretty good but the ads in the page looks ugly.. bloated&#8230;..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ashish Mohta</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-21303</link> <dc:creator>Ashish Mohta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:09:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-21303</guid> <description>Hi Thilak, I am inviting you for a game on the years ending. You are tagged http://www.technospot.net/blogs/index.php/2006/12/23/five-things-about-this-not-know-blogger/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Thilak,<br /> I am inviting you for a game on the years ending.<br /> You are tagged<br /> <a href="http://www.technospot.net/blogs/index.php/2006/12/23/five-things-about-this-not-know-blogger/" rel="nofollow">http://www.technospot.net/blogs/index.php/2006/12/23/five-things-about-this-not-know-blogger/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vincent</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-21302</link> <dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:05:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-21302</guid> <description>Poor Live/MSN, isn&#039;t even mention as a competitor =p</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Live/MSN, isn&#8217;t even mention as a competitor =p</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul Jacob</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-21219</link> <dc:creator>Paul Jacob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 06:39:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-21219</guid> <description>Thilak,Jimmy has just gave me a feedback about this news and he states that its totally out of context.Check it out:http://www.techaddi.com/index.php/archive/can-a-wiki-style-search-engine-compete-against-google/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thilak,</p><p>Jimmy has just gave me a feedback about this news and he states that its totally out of context.</p><p>Check it out:<a href="http://www.techaddi.com/index.php/archive/can-a-wiki-style-search-engine-compete-against-google/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techaddi.com/index.php/archive/can-a-wiki-style-search-engine-compete-against-google/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ashish Mohta</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-20925</link> <dc:creator>Ashish Mohta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 02:54:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-20925</guid> <description>No doubt why google has started buying other now.Its too much of competition now.Guruji already challeneged and now this.Guess google will be buying a lot of things next year</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt why google has started buying other now.Its too much of competition now.Guruji already challeneged and now this.Guess google will be buying a lot of things next year</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul Jacob</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-20839</link> <dc:creator>Paul Jacob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 23:37:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-20839</guid> <description>Yea I have already posted on this at my blog but im not sure if this idea would really work.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea I have already posted on this at my blog but im not sure if this idea would really work.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 1/19 queries in 0.009 seconds using apc
Object Caching 505/509 objects using apc

Served from: tech-buzz.net @ 2012-02-09 19:18:55 -->
