<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jimmy Wales To Compete With Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/</link>
	<description>Tech News, Web and Geeky Stuff!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:35:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thilak</title>
		<link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-23460</link>
		<dc:creator>Thilak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 17:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-23460</guid>
		<description>Anirudh: Yeah, that&#039;s what I meant to say</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anirudh: Yeah, that&#8217;s what I meant to say</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anirudh</title>
		<link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-23295</link>
		<dc:creator>Anirudh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 14:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-23295</guid>
		<description>I was talking about this:
&lt;blockquote&gt;The first three results will be Wikipedia content and remain results will be determined by Wikipediaâ€™s outbound links. So if a site has more links from Wikipedia then the site will climb up in the SERP page.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
and you mean &quot;remaining links&quot; which mean the other search results. This block of text is rather unclear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was talking about this:</p>
<blockquote><p>The first three results will be Wikipedia content and remain results will be determined by Wikipediaâ€™s outbound links. So if a site has more links from Wikipedia then the site will climb up in the SERP page.</p></blockquote>
<p>and you mean &#8220;remaining links&#8221; which mean the other search results. This block of text is rather unclear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thilak</title>
		<link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-22798</link>
		<dc:creator>Thilak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 07:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-22798</guid>
		<description>Anirudh: I disagree with you on this regard. The new Search Engine will comeout of Wikia Labs, it has nothing to do with Wikipedia. Its a standalone Search Engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anirudh: I disagree with you on this regard. The new Search Engine will comeout of Wikia Labs, it has nothing to do with Wikipedia. Its a standalone Search Engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anirudh</title>
		<link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-22612</link>
		<dc:creator>Anirudh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 05:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-22612</guid>
		<description>ps. tech crunch watermark on image</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps. tech crunch watermark on image</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anirudh</title>
		<link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-22610</link>
		<dc:creator>Anirudh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 05:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-22610</guid>
		<description>Well, this will be okay to replace wikipedia&#039;s current search, but it won&#039;t affect google. Say I&#039;m searching for information on the grand canyon, I&#039;ll get relevant details, but If I&#039;m looking for a technical question on linux, this will not yield the proper results. Google must partner with wikipedia and offer one result at the top if a corresponding wikipedia article is available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this will be okay to replace wikipedia&#8217;s current search, but it won&#8217;t affect google. Say I&#8217;m searching for information on the grand canyon, I&#8217;ll get relevant details, but If I&#8217;m looking for a technical question on linux, this will not yield the proper results. Google must partner with wikipedia and offer one result at the top if a corresponding wikipedia article is available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashish Mohta</title>
		<link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-21933</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashish Mohta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 19:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-21933</guid>
		<description>I didnt get it, why not a common indexing.I mean googles indexing and now wikpedia .....dont we need some standard? At the end it iwll be like 3 search engine providing ranks to each site whom would u go for.Obviously which dominates but that isnt right.

Like they all agreed on the common sitemap I am thinking if they can have a common thing for page ranking and indexing.Difficult though but an idea for sure..

And wikpedia results 3 top....i dont like that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didnt get it, why not a common indexing.I mean googles indexing and now wikpedia &#8230;..dont we need some standard? At the end it iwll be like 3 search engine providing ranks to each site whom would u go for.Obviously which dominates but that isnt right.</p>
<p>Like they all agreed on the common sitemap I am thinking if they can have a common thing for page ranking and indexing.Difficult though but an idea for sure..</p>
<p>And wikpedia results 3 top&#8230;.i dont like that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Cool</title>
		<link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-21803</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 18:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-21803</guid>
		<description>Question would be - What made Techcrunch to take such a big risk ? 

I have to say that that was daring ! It could have killed any small blog !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question would be &#8211; What made Techcrunch to take such a big risk ? </p>
<p>I have to say that that was daring ! It could have killed any small blog !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thilak</title>
		<link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-21768</link>
		<dc:creator>Thilak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 17:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-21768</guid>
		<description>Good to see lots of interaction going on at this post, but I wonder why TechCrunch posted a fake screenshot ?

Doesn&#039;t it hurt their ethics ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see lots of interaction going on at this post, but I wonder why TechCrunch posted a fake screenshot ?</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t it hurt their ethics ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Cool</title>
		<link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-21718</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 16:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-21718</guid>
		<description>Story needs to be updated...

Jimbo commented on my blog and he says Techcrunch&#039;s story is wrong !
http://www.technobeta.com/posts/wikiasari-the-search-engine-from-wikipedia/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Story needs to be updated&#8230;</p>
<p>Jimbo commented on my blog and he says Techcrunch&#8217;s story is wrong !<br />
<a href="http://www.technobeta.com/posts/wikiasari-the-search-engine-from-wikipedia/" rel="nofollow">http://www.technobeta.com/post.....wikipedia/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sankar Anand</title>
		<link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-21443</link>
		<dc:creator>Sankar Anand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-21443</guid>
		<description>the screen shot looks pretty good but the ads in the page looks ugly.. bloated.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the screen shot looks pretty good but the ads in the page looks ugly.. bloated&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashish Mohta</title>
		<link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-21303</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashish Mohta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-21303</guid>
		<description>Hi Thilak,
I am inviting you for a game on the years ending.
You are tagged
http://www.technospot.net/blogs/index.php/2006/12/23/five-things-about-this-not-know-blogger/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Thilak,<br />
I am inviting you for a game on the years ending.<br />
You are tagged<br />
<a href="http://www.technospot.net/blogs/index.php/2006/12/23/five-things-about-this-not-know-blogger/" rel="nofollow">http://www.technospot.net/blog.....w-blogger/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-21302</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-21302</guid>
		<description>Poor Live/MSN, isn&#039;t even mention as a competitor =p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Live/MSN, isn&#8217;t even mention as a competitor =p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Jacob</title>
		<link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-21219</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 06:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-21219</guid>
		<description>Thilak,

Jimmy has just gave me a feedback about this news and he states that its totally out of context.

Check it out:http://www.techaddi.com/index.php/archive/can-a-wiki-style-search-engine-compete-against-google/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thilak,</p>
<p>Jimmy has just gave me a feedback about this news and he states that its totally out of context.</p>
<p>Check it out:http://www.techaddi.com/index.php/archive/can-a-wiki-style-search-engine-compete-against-google/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashish Mohta</title>
		<link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-20925</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashish Mohta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 02:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-20925</guid>
		<description>No doubt why google has started buying other now.Its too much of competition now.Guruji already challeneged and now this.Guess google will be buying a lot of things next year</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt why google has started buying other now.Its too much of competition now.Guruji already challeneged and now this.Guess google will be buying a lot of things next year</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Jacob</title>
		<link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/comment-page-1/#comment-20839</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 23:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/12/23/jimmy-wales-to-compete-with-google/#comment-20839</guid>
		<description>Yea I have already posted on this at my blog but im not sure if this idea would really work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea I have already posted on this at my blog but im not sure if this idea would really work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
