<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Google is Secretly Testing Impression Based Ad Network</title> <atom:link href="http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/</link> <description>Tech Tips, Mobiles, Web and Computer How-Tos</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 10:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Steven Bao</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-144127</link> <dc:creator>Steven Bao</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:57:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/#comment-144127</guid> <description>Very interesting; myself, if I were Google, would not implement an impression-based ad network; but you said it correctly, building a brand name might be useful for this.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting; myself, if I were Google, would not implement an impression-based ad network; but you said it correctly, building a brand name might be useful for this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-140804</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 04:32:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/#comment-140804</guid> <description>I realize these are old comments above but this blog post is in the top spot for a Google search for &#039;impression based ad networks&#039;.  That&#039;s what led me here.I read somewhere that Google acquired Double Click I think it was in November of 2007 to use with it&#039;s adsense codes.  Is that true?  I just answered that myself.  Yep, do a search for &#039;Google acquires Double Click&#039;.What I don&#039;t get is that SpywareBlaster has had DoubleClick on it&#039;s spyware blocked list for years.  And it&#039;s still on there blocked list.If Google plans on using DoubleClick with it&#039;s adsense codes (if it isn&#039;t already) then what does this imply?  Just curious but will viewers and publishers that are not running SpywareBlaster be infected?    Will adsense publishers get credit for impressions when people that are running SpywareBlaster view their web pages?I&#039;ve been wondering about this cause I use SpywareBlaster.  I figured this was as good a place as any to ask.Thanks Mike</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize these are old comments above but this blog post is in the top spot for a Google search for &#8216;impression based ad networks&#8217;.  That&#8217;s what led me here.</p><p>I read somewhere that Google acquired Double Click I think it was in November of 2007 to use with it&#8217;s adsense codes.  Is that true?  I just answered that myself.  Yep, do a search for &#8216;Google acquires Double Click&#8217;.</p><p>What I don&#8217;t get is that SpywareBlaster has had DoubleClick on it&#8217;s spyware blocked list for years.  And it&#8217;s still on there blocked list.</p><p>If Google plans on using DoubleClick with it&#8217;s adsense codes (if it isn&#8217;t already) then what does this imply?  Just curious but will viewers and publishers that are not running SpywareBlaster be infected?    Will adsense publishers get credit for impressions when people that are running SpywareBlaster view their web pages?</p><p>I&#8217;ve been wondering about this cause I use SpywareBlaster.  I figured this was as good a place as any to ask.</p><p>Thanks<br /> Mike</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thilak</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-15628</link> <dc:creator>Thilak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:37:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/#comment-15628</guid> <description>Lovedeep: Its not just a spell mistake, but it was a grammar mistake too... I completely forgot to insert that wordThanks again</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovedeep: Its not just a spell mistake, but it was a grammar mistake too&#8230; I completely forgot to insert that word</p><p>Thanks again</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lovedeep Wadhwa</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-15623</link> <dc:creator>Lovedeep Wadhwa</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:26:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/#comment-15623</guid> <description>spelling mistakes are very common..i do make such mistakes everyday... :D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>spelling mistakes are very common..i do make such mistakes everyday&#8230; <img src='http://tech-buzz.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thilak</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-15608</link> <dc:creator>Thilak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:21:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/#comment-15608</guid> <description>Thanks Lovedeep, Sometimes I do commit some silly mistakes. Keep reporting them to me :D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Lovedeep, Sometimes I do commit some silly mistakes. Keep reporting them to me <img src='http://tech-buzz.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lovedeep Wadhwa</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-15606</link> <dc:creator>Lovedeep Wadhwa</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:19:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/#comment-15606</guid> <description>Is something wrong with the title of this post.or is my english bad..:shock:</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is something wrong with the title of this post.</p><p>or is my english bad..:shock:</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steven Bao</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-13071</link> <dc:creator>Steven Bao</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 02:49:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/#comment-13071</guid> <description>Very interesting; myself, if I were Google, would not implement an impression-based ad network; but you said it correctly, building a brand name might be useful for this.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting; myself, if I were Google, would not implement an impression-based ad network; but you said it correctly, building a brand name might be useful for this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thilak</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-12955</link> <dc:creator>Thilak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:06:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/#comment-12955</guid> <description>Hans: Yeah, I read it few months ago on Google Blogoscope</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hans: Yeah, I read it few months ago on Google Blogoscope</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hans</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-12949</link> <dc:creator>Hans</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 07:04:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/#comment-12949</guid> <description>there&#039;s nothing more secret than Google. Hey Thilak, have you ever heard that story? I don&#039;t know where I saw it but somebody by some errors got access to some files having info on a future project of Google.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there&#8217;s nothing more secret than Google. Hey Thilak, have you ever heard that story? I don&#8217;t know where I saw it but somebody by some errors got access to some files having info on a future project of Google.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ashish Mohta</title><link>http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/comment-page-1/#comment-12927</link> <dc:creator>Ashish Mohta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 01:56:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-buzz.net/2006/11/29/google-is-secretly-impression-based-ad-network/#comment-12927</guid> <description>Its hard but there is always a way to do it.Like make it happen when the visitors leave.Doe it clickGood news Regards Ashish</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its hard but there is always a way to do it.Like make it happen when the visitors leave.Doe it click</p><p>Good news<br /> Regards<br /> Ashish</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 381/422 objects using apc

Served from: tech-buzz.net @ 2012-05-24 03:30:05 -->
